
I considered just throwing this picture online without explanation and let the internet masses drool over the Olde Timey look, but got to thinking, the nuances are clearly above my photoshop pay grade. SO, while I want to share how awesome this picture from Busan, Korea now looks using a Photoshop Action called, "Colored Vintage Photo", I thought it prudent to share the secret of it's creation.
In a nutshell: Photoshop Actions. They are essentially macros for those of us who find the word "action" new and unfamiliar. While scanning hordes of pictures down at the Seattle Municipal Archives, I've come to
love photoshop actions. In the flick of a keystroke, I can arbitrarily rotate pictures 1 degree, 3 degree, clockwise, counter-clockwise, resize and save in .gif format. It saves me time, and allows for way more goofing off and scanning pictures at high resolution and stashing them on various servers for later access.
But after stumbling across this page of the best 70 free photoshop actions, I've come to appreciate them on a whole new level. All kinds of pretty effects, just click play, and watch your dinosaur computer's CPU churn through unimaginable amounts of mathematical and algorithmic calculations. Here they be:
70 Of The Best Photoshop Actions For Enhancing Photos | Creative NerdsBut with all this new eye candy, comes a troubling philosophical conundrum: Why are pictures that look old appealing? Could it be, that by looking old on the computer screen it suggests to us that the picture has been around for ages, and thus, is intriniscally important? Why else would a photograph remain intact, protected, even
scanned, if it weren't worth saving? This is well and good so far, no problems yet. The strangeness, the philosophical loose ends, begin when these processes are applied to new pictures. Suddenly we feel that same interest in the picture - it appears old, a slice in time, worthy of preservation no matter what the subject matter be - yet it hasn't earned that badge of honor yet.
If I take a picture of my couch, early in the morning, the radio not yet on, the couch as quiet, cool, and inanimate as it could possibly be, it probably wouldn't be the most riveting photo. But apply this process, and bam! Suddenly you can't help wonder, "what went down on that couch? (no sexual innuendo intended)" "What famous people sat, discussed, ate there?" "What is the story behind this couch, that a picture of it has survived so long?"
Does it take away from the experience if in fact nothing spectacular has happened on said couch? Is the intrigue somehow lessened and cheapened, if that couch had just been found on the side of the road the previous night? Bad example, then you
do wonder (read: worry) what happened on that couch. But hopefully the point is made. I don't know the answer, I just know pictures that undergo this process look
awesome.